Ohio Attorneys Face Discipline Over AI Hallucinations

The Ohio Disciplinary Counsel filed a complaint against a Cleveland-area attorney after his staff used AI tools that hallucinated false statements. This follows a recent Board of Professional Conduct recommendation to indefinitely suspend another Northeast Ohio lawyer for submitting fictitious case citations generated by AI. Read more on NBC4.

Popular posts from this blog

Reorganizing Ohio's Court Rules: Public Comment Open Until October 24, 2025

Proposed changes to court rules in Ohio are open for public comment until October 24, 2025 . The main initiative is a multipart effort to reorganize the rules by moving those concerning court practices and procedures from the Rules of Superintendence to the appropriate Rules of Practice and Procedure (Civil, Criminal, and Juvenile). This restructuring aims to create a more logical organization for the rules. Also under consideration are other amendments for the Rules of Appellate Procedure to enhance clarity and accommodate electronic filing, and for the Traffic Rules to comply with new legislation. These recommendations were presented by the relevant commissions and approved by the Supreme Court of Ohio for public review. Comments on the proposed Superintendence Rule amendments should be sent to:      Keely McWhorter       Supreme Court of Ohio       65 S. Front St.       Columbus, Ohio 43215   ...
Read more

New Legal Resources from the Ohio Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of Ohio has launched Resources for the Bench , a new online collection of bench cards, guides, and toolkits to help judges, lawyers, and the public navigate Ohio's legal system. These resources cover various topics from remote hearings to domestic violence protections, offering accessible summaries of Ohio statutes and court decisions to enhance understanding and support courtroom decision-making. To learn more about this valuable initiative, check out Court News Ohio for additional details .
Read more

Ohio Supreme Court Approves Limited AI Use for Court Translations

The Ohio Supreme Court adopted new rules that permit the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for translating non-substantive court information, such as website text or office hours, provided its use is disclosed. However, the rules strictly prohibit using AI to translate or interpret substantive legal writings like orders, forms, or any part of a legal proceeding, citing risks of error and jeopardizing constitutional rights. These new regulations, which went into effect on November 13th, are part of a broader effort to address the demand for qualified interpreters in Ohio courtrooms and also update requirements for interpreter certification. Read more about the rule changes on Bloomberg Law .
Read more