SCOTUS Narrows Universal Injunctions
The United States Supreme Court, in a 6–3 decision, recently
ruled on the scope of universal injunctions issued by federal courts. The case
stemmed from legal challenges to an executive order issued by President Trump
concerning birthright citizenship. However, the Court's majority opinion,
authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, did not address the constitutionality of
the executive order itself. Instead, the ruling focused on the authority of
federal courts to issue nationwide blocks against government policies. The
Court determined that such universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable
authority historically granted to federal courts, emphasizing that relief
should generally be tailored to the specific plaintiffs involved in a case.
This decision impacts how future challenges to executive actions may be
litigated, requiring lower courts to reconsider the breadth of their
injunctions and allowing 30 days for President Trump's birthright citizenship
order to take effect, absent further legal action.
Read the full opinion of the Court online.