Supreme Court of Ohio Clarifies Stalking Statute
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that petitioners for a civil stalking protection order are not required to prove they have already experienced mental distress . In a 5-2 decision , the Court held that R.C. 2903.211 is satisfied if a petitioner reasonably believes an offender will cause mental distress if encounters continue . The majority opinion resolved conflicting lower court interpretations by applying a grammatical analysis to the state's "menacing-by-stalking" statute . This decision affirmed a Fifth District Court of Appeals ruling , which granted a protection order to a man following hostile confrontations with his ex-wife’s partner.